View all questions & answers for the NSE 6 - Network Security 7.6 Support Engineer Materials exam
NSE 6 - Network Security 7.6 Support Engineer Materials-Question 92 Discussion
Comments
Selected Answers: A, C
As tested in my LAB,
-> Policy-based route (PBR) for transit traffic (source and destination don't belong to FortiGate), but with next hop set to same IP address of egress interface (so it simulates that misconfiguration), and setting Debug Flow, I was able to see "iprope_in_check() check failed" in logs, so A is correct
-> VIP for extip belonging to FortiGate outside interface and mappedip belonging to FortiGate inside interface, and configured firewall policy and local-in policy, I could see from logs that traffic was only hitting firewall policy, and never hit local-in policy for some reason, so D is wrong
Selected Answers: A, D
Selected Answers: C, D
A. Policy route misconfiguration: Policy routing usually results in a packet being sent out the "wrong" interface or failing a lookup in the fib_lookup (Forwarding Information Base), not specifically an iprope_in_check failure.
B. Traffic shaping: Traffic shaping (Rate Limiting) typically results in drops labelled as "shaper drop" or occurs much later in the egress process once the policy has already been accepted.
Selected Answers: C, D
What are two reasons you might see iprope_in_check() check failed, drop when using the debug flow? (Choose two answers)
Brave-Dump Clients Votes