View all questions & answers for the NSE 5 - FortiSASE and SD-WAN 7.6 Core Administrator Exam Materials exam
Question 53 Discussion
Comments
Selected Answers: D
In real life, personal tenants and corporate tenants often use the same FQDNs/URLs (e.g., login.microsoftonline.com, office.com, accounts.google.com).
Therefore:
DNS Filter (C) cannot reliably distinguish “corporate tenant vs personal tenant” if both rely on the same domains.
IPS (A) is not relevant: IPS detects and blocks attack patterns/exploits, not which tenant a user logs into.
API-Based CASB (B) is typically out-of-band. It’s great for visibility, auditing, and remediation via SaaS APIs (posture, files, sharing, etc.), but it’s not the usual mechanism to stop a user in real time from signing in to a personal tenant during web access.
Inline-CASB Headers (D) is designed exactly for this use case: since FortiSASE is in the traffic path (proxy/web inspection), it can inject specific HTTP headers toward the SaaS provider to enforce the SaaS vendor’s own tenant restriction capability. As a result:
if a user tries to authenticate to a personal tenant, the SaaS rejects it, and if the user authenticates to the approved corporate tenant, it works.
CORRECT - D
An organization must ensure that connected users can access only the company SaaS tenant while blocking personal tenants. Which FortiSASE feature can help meet this requirement? (Choose one answer)
Brave-Dump Clients Votes