View all questions & answers for the NSE 6 - Network Security 7.6 Support Engineer Materials exam
NSE 6 - Network Security 7.6 Support Engineer Materials - Question #20 Discussion
Community Explanations & Comments (5)
Brave-Dumps.com Admin
1 year ago
Selected: B
Verified by Network Security Support Engineer Study Guide page 511
Fatma Salih
9 months ago
Selected: D
I think the answer is D. If there was a DH mismatch, the tunnel wouldn't come up in the 1st place.
Adam
9 months ago
Selected: D
IKEv2 exchanges:
1- IKE_SA_INIT exchange -> equivalent of IKEv1 phase1
2- IKE_Auth exchange -> authentication + first Child SA (equivalent of IKEv1 phase2 without DH Group)
3- Create_Child_SA exchange -> creates a new child SA or rekeys an existing child SA (with DH Group)
4- Informational exchange
As option B mentions DH Group mismatch in IKE_SA_INIT (phase1), then phase 1 won't be up initially to begin with, so option B should be wrong.
1- IKE_SA_INIT exchange -> equivalent of IKEv1 phase1
2- IKE_Auth exchange -> authentication + first Child SA (equivalent of IKEv1 phase2 without DH Group)
3- Create_Child_SA exchange -> creates a new child SA or rekeys an existing child SA (with DH Group)
4- Informational exchange
As option B mentions DH Group mismatch in IKE_SA_INIT (phase1), then phase 1 won't be up initially to begin with, so option B should be wrong.
James
9 months ago
Selected: D
If the tunnel was initially brought up successfully, both of these phases must have succeeded.
Anonymous User
6 months ago
Selected: D
A, B, and C: All of these (mismatched proposals, DH groups, or Pre-Shared Keys) are checked during the initial handshake (IKE_SA_INIT or IKE_AUTH). If any of these were misconfigured, the tunnel would fail immediately at the start and would never be "initially brought up successfully."
What can cause an IKEv2 tunnel to go down after it was initially brought up successfully? (Choose one answer)
Brave-Dump Community Votes